Kudzu

Kudzu (Pueraria montana)

Introduction & Distribution  |  Biology & Identification  |  Habitat & Ecology  |  Impacts  |  Control  |  Policy  New York Distribution Map

 

Kudzu, “the vine that ate the South.” Kerry Britton, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org

Introduction & Distribution

Kudzu (Pueraria montana) is a semi-woody, trailing or climbing, perennial invasive vine native to China, Japan, and the Indian subcontinent. Kudzu is also known as foot-a-night vine, Japanese arrowroot, Ko-hemp, and “the vine that ate the South.” The vine, a legume, is a member of the bean family. It was first introduced to North America in 1876 in the Japanese pavilion at the Philadelphia Centennial Exposition. A second major promotion of kudzu came in 1884 in the Japanese pavilion at the New Orleans Exposition. The first recorded use of kudzu in North America was as a shade plant on porches in the American South (the plant produces attractive, fragrant purplish flowers in mid-summer). Kudzu was heavily promoted in the early-1900s when the government paid farmers to use the vine for erosion control (more than a million acres are estimated to have been planted as a result) and as a drought-tolerant, nitrogen-fixing legume (capable of bacterial growth with stem and root nodules converting free nitrogen to nitrates, which the host plant utilizes for its growth in low nitrogen soils) for livestock feed. During the Great Depression, thousands of acres of kudzu were planted by the Civilian Conservation Corps for hillside stabilization projects. In some areas, kudzu blossoms have been prized for their use in making kudzu blossom jelly and jam. The long kudzu fibers are also used in basket making. Ko-hemp, a more refined version of kudzu fiber has long been used for cloth weaving in China.

 

Use of kudzu for cattle grazing in the early-1900s. USDA NRCS Archive, USDA NRCS, Bugwood.org

These government-sanctioned uses of the vine, combined with its innate, aggressive, range-expansion capabilities resulted in a rapid spread of kudzu throughout North America. Kudzu can now be found in 30 states from Oregon and Washington State to Massachusetts, particularly infesting states from Nebraska and Texas eastward most heavily; the vine is most common in the South. It has also been discovered in Hawaii and the warm, south-facing growing region on the north shore of Lake Erie in the Canadian Province of Ontario.

 

U.S. range of kudzu. USDA PLANTS database, July 2014.

Biology & Identification

Kudzu is an herbaceous to semi-woody, climbing or trailing, nonnative, deciduous, perennial vine or liana (a vine that is rooted in ground-level soil and uses trees and other vertical supports (telephone polls, buildings, etc.) to climb to the forest canopy to get access to light. A well-known example would be common wild grape).

 

Kudzu covering other vegetation and forming a liana. James H. Miller, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org
Close-up of a kudzu liana. Leslie J. Mehrhoff, University of Connecticut, Bugwood.org

Kudzu produces long, hairy vines from a central root crown. Kudzu has dark-green, hairy, alternate, compound leaves, 2 – 8 inches (5 – 20 cm) in length with three oval- to heart-shaped leaflets 3 – 4 inches (8 – 10 cm) long at the end; these leaves may be slightly or entirely lobed. Stems are also hairy. Vines can grow up to 30 to 100 feet (9 – 30.5 meters) per year. The vines have 0.8 – 1 inch (2 – 2.5 cm) flowers on 4 – 8-inch (10 – 20 cm) axillary racemes (short, equal length stalks along a main stem forming clusters of flowers with the oldest flowers toward the base with the newest end of the stalk terminating in one or more undeveloped buds). Vertical kudzu vines in full sunlight produce flowers in late-summer; horizontal vines seldom produce flowers. The flowers are typically red, purple, or magenta with a strong, grape-like aroma; pink or white flowers occur occasionally.

 

Kudzu leaflets found at end of stem. James H. Miller, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org
Kudzu flowers made the plant popular for planting around porches. Forest and Kim Starr, Starr Environmental, Bugwood.org

 

Population Expansion

Kudzu populations spread both asexually and by seed germination.

Asexual (vegetative) spread:

The most common method of spread is by setting new root crowns at almost every node where horizontal trailing stems come in contact with bare soil (this can be every few feet); new vines will form at these nodes the following spring and will spread out in all available directions. Kudzu tap roots can grow up to 12 feet (3.6 meters) long and weigh up to several hundred pounds. This may help kudzu to withstand long periods of drought.

 

A typical mature kudzu root crown. The Coalition To Control Kudzu Without Chemicals (http://www.kokudzu.com/)

Sexual spread:

Kudzu usually does not flower until its third year, with flowers and seeds forming only on vertical climbing vines. Kudzu produces clusters of 20 – 30 hairy brown seed pods, 1.6 – 2 inch (4 – 5 cm) long pods. Each pod contains from 3 to 10 kidney bean-shaped seeds, of which only 1 or 2 seeds are viable. Dormant  viable seeds are unable to germinate until after their seed coats have become water permeable as a result of physical scarification (breaking the seed coat by abrasion or prolonged thermal stress). Seeds deposited below the vines in the seed bank may take several years to germinate. This can be problematic during control efforts because it can result in the reemergence of the plants years after eradication was believed to have been achieved. It has been observed that kudzu in North America is more likely to grow asexually than by setting seed. It appears that this is due to kudzu seedlings being outcompeted by vegetatively produced vines.

 

A small cluster of kudzu pods. James H. Miller & Ted Bodner, Southern Weed Science Society, Bugwood.org

 

Habitat & Ecology

Factors that help determine how invasive kudzu will be in any habitat appear to be climate and availability of light. Warmth and humidity are important factors, with greater colonization corresponding to warmer average annual temperatures and higher average humidity. To reach additional light, the vines climb existing vegetation and hard vertical surfaces. It does not appear that the composition of the local native plant community has much influence on kudzu invasiveness. Even undisturbed plant communities adjacent to an existing population of kudzu can be at risk. Typical kudzu habitats are usually open, disturbed areas such as roadside ditches, rights-of-way, and abandoned fields. In such settings, kudzu can form large monocultures with thousands of plants per acre.

Kudzu has a strong daily leaf orientation capability; by controlling the leaf position as it faces toward or away from the sun, kudzu can control sunlight intensity on the leaflets that are exposed. This ability can reduce leaf temperatures relative to native vegetation and minimize the amount of water lost from the plant by leaf surface transpiration during times of peak sunlight. It may also be a benefit below forest canopies where light is dim by increasing the surface area of leaves receiving sunlight. Leaves exposed to open sunlight may be able to maximize photosynthesis, store additional food in kudzu’s rhizomes, and have a competitive advantage over native vegetation.

Kudzu accumulates and maintains substantial carbon reserves in large woody, tuberous roots, again giving it a competitive advantage.

Trailing stems in open areas tend to die back in the winter. Vertically climbing vines develop thick bark and can reach diameters greater than 0.8 inch (2 cm), aiding in overwintering.

Kudzu vines can more easily grow around smaller vines such as honeysuckle (Lonicera spp.) than around bare tree trunks. This growth tactic appears to aid the plant in the formation of lianas in forested areas. Once established, kudzu lianas compete with forest trees both for sunlight in the crown and for water and nutrients from the soil. The vines may directly damage colonized trees by strangulation. These physical traits of a kudzu liana significantly impact the ability of native trees to grow and reproduce, increasing the early mortality of native trees, and preventing the establishment of new trees or shrubs in the dim light below the colonized canopy.

Kudzu lianas can cause weakened trees to fall from the weight of the overgrowth of vines or by pulling down trees attached to the liana when one weak tree succumbs to the weight of ice freezing onto the tree and/or the vines.

Kudzu thrives where the climate favors mild winters (40 – 60°F {4 -16°C}), summer temperatures rising above 80°F (27°C), precipitation greater than 40 inches (101 cm), and a long growing season.

Because of its underground root crowns, kudzu can escape fire damage. During the growing season, kudzu’s underground root system can provide significant water to the foliage; the high water content stems and foliage are able to resist some fire damage that may kill nearby native plants.

There is some indication (not yet definitively proven) that wildfire (or controlled burn) soil heating may promote kudzu seed germination by scarifying the seedcoat which would allow penetration by water to allow for germination.

Robert L. Anderson, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org

 

Impacts

Native Plant Community Impacts:

A kudzu invasion can cause several different types of major impacts on native plant communities: it can crowd them out; it can outcompete them; and it can physically crush them.

Since kudzu can fix nitrogen in its roots, it can thrive in soils too low in nitrogen to support robust growth of native vegetation, thereby outcompeting native plants for both nutrition and growing space, ultimately forming monospecific plant communities. This significantly alters natural plant communities and the animals that rely on those natural communities for food and habitat. Areas of more than 100 acres (40 hectares) with 1 – 2 plants per square foot, or 40,000 to 85,000 plants per acre (107,000 to 215,000 plants per hectare) can be found in the American South.

Kudzu’s rapid growth rate and its manner of growing over whatever it encounters in its path can also overwhelm native plant communities, also resulting in monospecific stands of the vine.

As heavy infestations of kudzu can completely cover trees of almost any size, kudzu lianas can both fell trees from their extreme weight or nearly eliminate light availability within the forest canopy, weakening or killing shade-intolerant species, particularly pines. Once kudzu gains access to the forest canopy, the liana formed can spread faster and more aggressively through a forest.

 

An extreme example of kudzu overgrowth of natural vegetation. Kerry Britton, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org

 

Economic Impacts:

By outcompeting, smothering, and physically removing native vegetation, kudzu damages to lost forest production for southern commercial timber producers has been estimated to be as high as $48 per acre ($118 per hectare) per year. Kudzu control costs can be as high as $200 per acre per year. Control costs on power company rights-of-way and transmission equipment have been estimated as high as $1.5 million per year. Kudzu can also be a problem along highway rights-of-way.

 

Kudzu overgrowth of a southern highway embankment. Chris Evans, Illinois Wildlife Action Plan, Bugwood.org

 

Control

With a growth rate of up to one foot (0.3 meter) per day, simply controlling or managing kudzu can become a “fool’s errand” of never ending activity. In areas where the plant cannot be tolerated at all, kudzu control is basically kudzu eradication. To prevent reinvasion, complete eradication is required, which means every root crown on a site must be killed. Due to the numerous root crowns at vine nodes, eradication of a well-established population of kudzu could take 5 – 10 years of concentrated effort. The more mature the population, the more difficult eradication becomes as a result the numerous crowns and the large rhizome system that can store significant amounts of starch to feed the plant. Lianas are also more efficient at producing starch and sending it to the root system than are horizontal, ground-based vines.

Eradication of kudzu with herbicides calls for frequent defoliation during the growing season, while most of the plant’s energy is devoted to vine production and growth. Defoliation forces the plant to call on root starch reserves to resume foliage growth activities, helping to diminish reserves of starch and prevent storage of new reserves. If a single treatment is all that can be undertaken in a year, it should be implemented in early-fall as foliage starch allocation to the root system replenishing that used for growth during the spring and summer takes place in the early-fall.

If physical or mechanical control methods are selected, eradication of well-established kudzu populations could take many years or be ineffective in the long-term. Mechanical harvesting of kudzu foliage limits the production of new food reserves by reducing photosynthesis; regrowth helps to deplete starch stored in the root system. Mowing of trailing vines and root crowns every two weeks may take up to ten years to eradicate small, immature patches of kudzu, assuming that all root heads are mowed. Mowing is more likely to result in eradication if used with herbicide application. During mechanical eradication efforts, all cut plant material should be destroyed by burning or by bagging and landfilling.

The use of intensive conservation grazing by herbivores such as sheep or goats can help control young, tender kudzu growth and make control by herbicides more effective over shorter periods of time by helping to reduce energy reserves.

For information regarding appropriate use of herbicides against kudzu and other invasive plants, please consult The Nature Conservancy’s Weed Control Methods Handbook. Make certain to consult your state’s environmental conservation or natural resource management agency to determine which herbicides are legal for kudzu control in your state.

 

Herbicide spraying for kudzu control. James H. Miller, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org

 

Policy Status

In the 1950s, the Agricultural Conservation Program removed kudzu from the list of species acceptable for use as an agricultural forage crop or soil stabilization plant. Congress listed kudzu as a Federal Noxious Weed in 1998. In 2014, the State of New York designated kudzu as a prohibited plant under the state’s Environmental Conservation Law.

New York Distribution Map

This map shows confirmed observations (green points) submitted to the NYS Invasive Species Database. Absence of data does not necessarily mean absence of the species at that site, but that it has not been reported there. For more information, please visit iMapInvasives.

Wild Parsnip

Introduction and Distribution  |  Habitat, Biology, and Ecology  |  Impacts  |  Prevention  |  Control and  Management | New York Distribution Map

 

Wild parsnip (Pastinaca sativa). Leslie J. Mehrhoff, University of Connecticut, Bugwood.org

Introduction & Distribution

Wild parsnip (Pastinaca sativa) is a biennial/perennial herb native to Eurasia. In appearance, it looks and smells quite like cultivated parsnip (in point of fact, wild parsnip is part of the Apiaceae (or Umbelliferae) family which includes carrots, celery, parsley, parsnip, Angelica, and Queen Anne’s Lace, most of which are aromatic plants with hollow stems). It is believed to be an escapee from parsnip that was originally under cultivation. The plant typically can grow up to 4 feet (1.2 m) tall in an average year. Wild parsnip is common throughout the northern United States and southern Canada. Its range reaches from Vermont to California and south to Louisiana (it is not found in Hawaii, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, and Florida). Reported populations can be found across New York State with the heaviest concentrations being found in the Lower Hudson Valley, Catskills, and southern Adirondacks.

 

North American range of wild parsnip (Pastinaca sativa). USDA PLANTS database, July 2014.

Habitat, Biology & Ecology

Wild parsnip is an herbaceous plant which can grow from 4 – 5 feet (123 – 150 cm) tall. It can survive in a broad range of environmental settings, from dry soils to wet meadows. It grows best in rich, calcareous, alkaline, moist soils. It is commonly found growing along roadsides, in pastures, and in abandoned fields, or any place where the soil has been disturbed and native vegetation has yet to become fully established.

The roots are generally smooth and cylindrical, although sometimes lateral roots will grow out from the central tap root.

Seedlings emerge from February through April, form rosettes in their first year, and grow vegetatively for one or more years, at which time they will form an aerial shoot (called a “bolt”) and flower. Wild parsnip produces a rosette of broad, hairless, ovate, compound pinnate leaves, up to 6 inches (15.2 cm) in length, terminating with several pairs of leaflets with saw-toothed margins; they can grow up to 16 inches (40 cm) long. Leaflets are arranged in pairs along the stalk. Lower leaves have short stems, upper leaves are stemless. The leaves give off a pungent odor when crushed. During the vegetative growth season, wild parsnip continuously produces and loses leaves. The flower stalk develops from the rosette in the second year and can grow to a height of 4 – 5 feet (123 – 150 cm). It is grooved, hairy, and, except at the nodes, hollow. The stalk is sparsely branched. Over the winter above ground wild parsnip plants die back with only one or two leaves remaining on each plant.

 

First-year wild parsnip growth. Patrick J. Alexander @ USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database.

 

Close-up of wild parsnip leaves. Patrick J. Alexander @ USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database

Wild parsnip stems are hollow except at the nodes. Photo: Missouri Dept. of Conservation

Wild Parsnip stem. Leslie J. Mehrhoff, University of Connecticut, Bugwood.org

Each wild parsnip plant produces hundreds of small yellow flowers which bloom from June to mid-July. The flowers are arranged in a loose compound umbel (a structure made up of a number of short flower stalks which spread from a common point, looking like the ribs of an umbrella). An umbel can measure from 4 – 8 inches (10 – 20 cm) in diameter. The flowers consist of five yellow petals curled inward, five stamens, and one pistil. The large, straw to light-brown seeds that are produced by the flower heads are round to oval, flat, slightly ribbed with narrow wings and are 1 ½ – 3 inches (4 – 8 mm) long. Seeds mature by early July. Plants die after producing seeds; the dead stalk will remain standing through the winter. Seeds can remain viable in the soil for four years. Seedling mortality is high; less than 1% of seedlings survive to mature and reproduce.

Wild parsnip second-year growth. Photo: Virginia Tech Weed ID Guide

Mature flowering wild parsnip. Photo: University of Massachusetts Extension
Wild parsnip umbel. Virginia Tech Weed ID Guide
Wild parsnip seeds. Leslie J. Mehrhoff, University of Connecticut, Bugwood.org

 

Click the table (above) for a 2-page ID guide to giant hogweed, native cow parsnip, native purple-stemmed Angelica, poison hemlock, and wild parsnip

Impacts

Ecological Impacts:

Wild parsnip invades and modifies disturbed open habitats. Well-established fields and meadows are not likely to be invaded, but parsnip can become well-established along the edges and in disturbed areas. Once an infestation begins, it can spread into adjacent areas and form dense stands in high-quality fields and meadows. Wild parsnip is also very persistent on sites that remain disturbed or bare such as paths, roadsides, and utility rights-of-way.

Human Health Impacts:

While wild Parsnip roots are edible, the plant produces a compound in its leaves, stems, flowers, and fruits that causes intense, localized burning, rash, severe blistering, and discoloration on contact with the skin on sunny days. This condition, known as phytophotodermatitis, is caused by furanocoumarin contained in the sap. This is not an allergic reaction, it is a chemical burn brought on by an increase in the skin’s sensitivity to sunlight. Affected areas can remain discolored and sensitive to sunlight for up to two years, similar to but not as severe as contact with giant hogweed. This reaction is not brought on by contact with the foliage of the plant, only by contact with the sap.

Contact may occur when working, hiking, and harvesting crops, including when visiting u-pick operations. To reduce the risk of exposure to wild parsnip sap, when undertaking such pursuits one should wear long-sleeved shirts, gloves and long pants.

If one should come in contact with wild parsnip sap, you should immediately cover the exposed skin to prevent the reaction to sunlight (but the area will remain sensitized for about eight hours). The contact area should be washed with warm water and a mild soap. If exposure to sunlight causes a burn and blisters to develop the affected area should be covered with a cool, damp cloth to help relieve pain. The blistered skin should be kept out of the sunlight to avoid further burning. If blistering is severe, see a physician. There is no cure for parsnip burns; however, a topical or systemic cortisone steroid may relieve discomfort.

 

Wild parsnip burns. Andrew Link, Lacrosse Tribune 2013

The essential oil of parsnip roots contains a large percentage of Myristicine, a strong human hallucinogen.

Wild parsnip is regulated in Ohio, Illinois, Tennessee, and Wisconsin.

Prevention of Establishment & Spread

Remove new infestations while they are still small. Avoid mowing areas with wild parsnip when viable seeds are present as equipment readily spreads seed to new areas. Clean mowing equipment before moving from an area with wild parsnip to one without. When possible, plan to harvest/mow areas without wild parsnip before moving to fields where it is present. Time control efforts to prevent spread of the plant.

Control & Management

Management decisions should be based on the quality of the area, the degree of the infestation, and use of the infested area by people or livestock.

Manual control for small patches is effective. Cut the root 1” below the ground using a tool such as a spaded shovel or remove plants by hand pulling, gripping the stalk just above the ground. These control measures should be undertaken before wild parsnip plants go to seed. If hand pulling after seed formation, take steps to destroy the seeds. For small areas which have set seed, cut the tops with clippers, bag the seed heads in clear plastic and allow to rot.

Mowing – Mow when plants first produce flowers, but before seeds enlarge. At this stage plants have depleted their root resources and often die when cut. Some plants will re-sprout, so a follow-up mowing may be needed. When using any type of mowing equipment, take precautions to prevent plant sap from contacting exposed skin. Mowing can tend to favor wild parsnip rosettes as more sunlight is able to reach them, as well as reducing the number of plants competing with them for light and nutrients.

Chemicals – General-use herbicides such as glyphosate or triclopyr can be applied as spot treatments to basal rosettes. Be sure to follow all label and state requirements.

Biocontrol – No effective options are currently known. The parsnip webworm infests individual plants, but is not known to significantly damage large patches.

Plan to monitor the area long-term for seedlings emerging from the seed bank.

Whatever type of control method is employed, make certain to take measures to protect skin and eyes from contact with the plant’s sap.

New York Distribution Map

This map shows confirmed observations (green points) submitted to the NYS Invasive Species Database. Absence of data does not necessarily mean absence of the species at that site, but that it has not been reported there. For more information, please visit iMapInvasives.

Mugwort

Background  |  Origin and Expansion  |  Biology  |  Characteristics and Identification  |  Impacts  |  Prevention, Control, and Management  |  New York Distribution Map

Background

Mugwort  (Artemesia vulgaris) is an invasive perennial forb that is widespread throughout North America, though it is most common in the eastern United States and Canada. It is a weed of nurseries, turfgrass, vineyards, waste areas, forest edges, and roadsides. Mugwort spreads aggressively through an extensive rhizome system and will readily form large, mono-specific stands.

Origin and Expansion

Mugwort is native to Europe and eastern Asia, where it has historically been used as a medicinal herb. Seed may have been first introduced to North America as early as the 16th century by Jesuit missionaries in Canada. It was also introduced throughout the continent as a contaminant in ship ballast and nursery stock.

Biology

Mugwort is a perennial with an extensive rhizome system. Shoots emerge during the spring, and flowering occurs from July to late September. A single plant can, depending on its environment, produce up to 200,000 seeds.  The small seeds (~1mm in diameter) are largely wind dispersed. Seed production does not seem to be a major factor in the spread of mugwort populations, however, and some biotypes do not produce viable seed.  Instead, mugwort spreads largely through vegetative expansion and the anthropogenic dispersal of root propagules. The root system is extensive though shallow (to 20 cm in depth), with numerous branching rhizomes up to 1 cm in diameter. Plants can regenerate from rhizome fragments as small as 2 cm (Klingeman et al. 2004).

Characteristics and Identification

The rarely-seen seedlings have oblong cotyledons without petioles. Adult stems are smooth and longitudinally ridged, with numerous axillary branches towards the upper portions of the plant. The stems become somewhat woody as they age. The leaves are alternate, densely covered with wooly, silver-white hairs on the underside, and slightly hairy on the upper surface. Leaf morphology is variable throughout the plant. The lower leaves are petiolate, with stipules at the base, and generally coarsely toothed and pinnately lobed. The upper leaves are sessile and lanceolate with smooth or toothed margins. The numerous ray and disk flowers are small (5 mm), green, and grow in racemes and clusters at the end of stems and branches. The foliage is aromatic and slightly pungent.

Impacts

Mugwort is a problematic weed in nurseries, where small root fragments can easily contaminate nursery stock. It is also a major weed in turf grass, field-grown ornamental crops, and orchards. Stands of mugwort displace native species, and can delay or disrupt succession in natural ecosystems (Barney and DiTommaso 2003). Mugwort produces several terpenoid potential allellochemicals, and decaying mugwort foliage has been shown to inhibit the growth of red clover in laboratory experiments (Inderjit and Foy 1999). Mugwort pollen is a common cause of hay fever.

Prevention, Control, and Management

The dense root system of mugwort can make it difficult to control. Pulling is ineffective, and may even promote growth by leaving residual rhizome fragments in the soil. Mugwort tolerates mowing, and even sustained mowing over two years will not fully eradicate mugwort stands. The relatively shallow roots make mugwort vulnerable to repeated cultivation in agricultural systems, though this practice risks spreading root propagules.

Chemical control of mugwort can have limited effectiveness. Though non-specific broadleaf herbicides such as glyphosate or dicamba can effectively control mugwort, the rates required for adequate suppression are rarely economical (Bradley and Hagood 2002). For small infestations, multiple spot-treatments of glyphosate can be effective (Bing 1983).

New York Distribution Map

This map shows confirmed observations (green points) submitted to the NYS Invasive Species Database. Absence of data does not necessarily mean absence of the species at that site, but that it has not been reported there. For more information, please visit iMapInvasives.

Purple Loosestrife

Background  |  Origin and Expansion  |  Biology  |  Description  |  Impacts  |  Control | New York Distribution Map

 

Background

The Eurasian forb purple loosestrife, Lythrum salicaria, is an erect, branching, perennial that has invaded temperate wetlands throughout North America. It grows in many habitats with wet soils, including marshes, pond and lakesides, along stream and river banks, and in ditches. Purple loosestrife is also capable of establishing in drier soils, and may spread to meadows and even pastured land. It prefers full sun, but can grow in partially shaded environments. Purple loosestrife stem tissue develops air spaces between cells, allowing them to respire when partially submerged in water.

Stand of mature purple loosestrife. [Photo: Lesley J. Mehrhoff, University of CT, Invasive.org]

Origin and Expansion

Purple loosestrife is native to Europe, Asia and northern Africa, with a range that extends from Britain to Japan. Purple loosestrife was probably introduced multiple times to North America, both as a contaminant in ship ballast and as an herbal remedy for dysentery, diarrhea, and other digestive ailments. It was well-established in New England by the 1830s, and spread along canals and other waterways. Purportedly sterile cultivars, with many flower colors, are still sold by nurseries. Its range now extends throughout Canada and to all states but Hawaii and Florida.

North American range (December 2015).  Map: USDA NRCS PLANTS Database

Biology

Purple loosestrife is a perennial, with a dense, woody rootstock that can produce dozens of stems. Shoot emergence and seed germination occurs as early as late April, and flowering begins by mid-June. Seedlings grow rapidly, and first year plants can reach nearly a meter in height and may even produce flowers. The flowers are insect-pollinated, principally by nectar feeders like bees and butterflies. Seed development begins by late July and continues throughout the season and into autumn. A single plant can produce over 2 million seeds. Senescence occurs with the first frost, and dead stems persist throughout the winter.

Though purple loosestrife seeds may not be particularly long-lived in the seed bank (they can survive for at least 3 years), the sheer number of seeds produced allows them to readily capitalize on disturbance. Seeds are dispersed by wind for short distances, by floating, and by anthropogenic means. Germination is best in wet, open soil under relatively warm temperatures (greater than 68°F). The seeds are capable of germinating and establishing under standing water. Though the rootstock buds prolifically, purple loosestrife does not generally spread through vegetative reproduction. Stem fragments can regrow, however, and mowing or otherwise damaging the plants may spread vegetative propagules.

Purple loosestrife flowers in full bloom.  [Photo: Lesley J. Mehrhoff, University of CT, Invasive.org]
Purple loosestrife flowers in full bloom.  [Photo: Lesley J. Mehrhoff, University of CT, Invasive.org]

Description  

Seedlings have oval cotyledons with long petioles. The stalkless stem leaves are 5-14 cm long, lance-shaped, and opposite. Leaf pairs often grow at 90 degree angles from one another, and leaves near the flowers are sometimes alternate. Stems are upright, angular, and densely hairy. Mature plants can reach up to 4m in height, and older plants often appear bush-like, with sometimes dozens of woody stems growing from a single rootstock. The showy purple flowers have 5-7 petals and grow in pairs or clusters on 10-40 cm tall spikes. Seeds are small (less than 1 mm in length) and lack an endosperm.

Purple loosestrife stalk  and leaves. Photo: Ohio State Weed Lab, The Ohio State  University, Invasive.org.
Purple loosestrife stalk  and leaves. Photo: Theodore Webster, USDA Agricultural research Service, Invasive.org

Impacts

Purple loosestrife is competitive and can rapidly displace native species if allowed to establish. Once established, the prolific seed production and dense canopy of purple loosestrife suppresses growth and regeneration of native plant communities. Monotypic stands of purple loosestrife may inhibit nesting by native waterfowl and other birds. Other aquatic wildlife, such as amphibians and turtles, may be similarly affected. The dense roots and stems trap sediments, raising the water table and reducing open waterways, which in turn may diminish the value of managed wetlands and impede water flow.

Large stands of purple loosestrife can clog waterways and deprive native wildlife of habitat and food. [Photo: Lesley J. Mehrhoff, University of CT, Invasive.org]

Control

Small infestations can be pulled by hand, though care must be taken to completely remove the root crown. Glyphosate or triclopyr based herbicides can also effectively control small stands, but as they are expensive and non-selective they are generally unsuitable for large purple loosestrife infestations. Mechanical or chemical management will require multiple years to completely remove adult plants and exhaust the seedbank.

Four species beetles (2 leaf beetles and 2 weevils) have been released in the United States as biocontrol agents for purple loosestrife. They have had some measure of success controlling purple loosestrife populations. The leaf-feeding beetles Galerucella calmariensis and G. pusilla defoliate and attack apical buds as both adults and larvae and can slow growth and diminish seed production. The weevil Nanophyes marmoratus feeds on seeds and flower buds, and the weevil Hylobius transversovittatus attacks both roots (as larvae) and foliage (as adults).

New York Distribution Map

This map shows confirmed observations (green points) submitted to the NYS Invasive Species Database. Absence of data does not necessarily mean absence of the species at that site, but that it has not been reported there. For more information, please visit iMapInvasives.

European Starling

BackgroundOriginHabitatIntroduction and SpreadImpactsIdentificationPrevention and ControlOccurrences

Background

The European starling (Sturnus vulgaris) is native to Europe and then was introduced into other countries around the world including North America. European starlings have a glossy black appearance and are commonly found in large flocks whose flying is synchronized. About 100 starlings were first introduced by Shakespeare enthusiasts in 1890 in Central Park, New York and are now one of the most abundant birds in North America with a population of approximately 200 million. They are found across the entire United States and compete with native species as well as destroy crops.

European Starlings. Photo: Lee Karney, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Bugwood.org

Origin

European Starlings’ native range is Europe, southwest Asia, and northern Africa.

Habitat

European starlings are well adapted to living in a variety of environments. Starlings are ground foragers that feed on a variety of insects in the soil as well as various seeds and fruits available. They tend to prefer open grasslands or habitats with low tree and shrub cover. During the breeding season, starlings will nest in cavities, such as holes in trees or other protected spaces. Starlings are very well adapted to disturbance and can be found in rural and urban environments.

Introduction and Spread

European starlings were intentionally introduced into the United States in Central Park, New York because those admiring the works of Shakespeare wanted to see all the birds mentioned in his creations represented in North America. One of the contributors to the success of this invasive species is the starlings’ flexibility in habitat selection (Clergeau and Quenot 2006). Starlings are prolific breeders producing on average one to two clutches per year with four to six eggs per clutch for each nesting pair. Eggs are incubated for approximately 12 days before hatching and then it takes about 3 weeks for nestlings to fledge (Linz et al. 2007). Starlings can live for approximately 2-3 years or more.

Impacts

The damage caused by European starlings on the agricultural industry was estimated to be approximately $800 million per year at $5 per hectare (Pimentel et al. 2000). Starlings eat cattle rations and destroy fruit and grain crops. Some starlings may also carry various diseases which may be transmissible to humans, other birds (including poultry), and livestock (Linz et al. 2007).

Due to the flocking nature of starlings and being well adapted in urban settings, roosts near airports have become a large problem. If a plane flies through a large flock of starlings, the birds can get caught in the jet engines causing damage to the aircraft as well as pose a hazard to humans. Additionally, in urban and rural settings, bird may seek shelter in barns and industrial buildings and create a lot of noise and filth which pose health hazards.

Ecologically, starlings may outcompete native cavity-nesting birds for nest sites. While there are no significant results indicating species declines for all native cavity nesters due to starlings, Koenig (2003) did find that certain species, such as native sapsuckers (Sphyrapicus spp.) were negatively impacted by starling presence. Starlings are also frugivores, meaning they feed on the fruits of plants. When fruits pass through the system of a bird after being ingested it may increase the likelihood that those seeds will germinate in some cases. A study done in 2009 found that the digestive system of starlings will increase seed germination after feeding  on invasive autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellata) and invasive oriental bittersweet (Celastrus orbiculatus) fruit and that the seed stayed inside the starlings long enough for dispersal to occur (LaFleur et al. 2009).

Identification

Starlings look similar to blackbirds and have a short, square tail with a slender, yellow beak.  Their wings are pointed and triangular. The plumage of a European starling is a glossy black with green, purple, blue or bronze iridescence. In the fall, starlings may have a spotty appearance after molting, but the spots on their wing tips wear away by spring. Male and females look similar however, the female may have a slightly duller appearance.  Additionally, in the breeding season the lower mandible of the beak in males will appear blue-gray and pinkish in females. Starlings are noisy birds making many clicks, whistles, rattles, squeaks, and sounds mimicking those from their environment or songs from other birds.

Adult European Starling.  Photo: Lee Karney, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Bugwood.org

Prevention and Control

To prevent further spread of European starlings, eggs and nests can be destroyed before the nestlings are able to fledge. Sticky polybutene materials may also be placed in roosting sites to deter birds from landing in a specific area. The most common for removing already established flocks of starlings from an area, is to frighten or harass the birds using propane exploders, pyrotechnics, hawk kites, and ultrasonic sounds. However, using these harassing techniques for control produces only temporary results, as the birds may come back once the control methods are stopped or once they are no longer frightened by them. There are chemicals that have been used that stimulate erratic behavior in birds that ingest it, which frightens other birds away and eventually kills the consumer. Other toxic chemicals, or Starlicides can be used which poison the birds and are lethal within 1-3 days, however non-target birds, such as native song birds, hawks and owls may also be affected if they consume the toxicants. Typically, these chemicals are quickly metabolized and are excreted which reduces effects on organisms higher in the food chain that consume the birds (Linz et al. 2003). When using any chemical, remember to read and follow the directions on the label.

Occurrences

European starlings are native to Europe and in parts of Asia and Africa. They were introduced into North America, South Africa, New Zealand, and Australia. Starlings are now found across the United States, in the Bahamas, Central America, Yucatan Peninsula, Puerto Rico, Jamaica, and Cuba.

Late Blight

OriginHabitat and SpreadImpactsIdentification on PotatoesIdentification on TomatoesPrevention and ControlOccurrences

Background

Late blight (Phytophythora infestans) is a disease that affects the stem, leaves, fruits, and tubers of potato and tomato crops. The disease was first discovered in the United States in the early 1840s where it caused devastation to many crop yields. Late blight is also responsible for causing the Irish potato famine in 1845. Phytophythora infestans is an oomycete pathogen.  In other words, it shares similar superficial characteristics with fungi, such as reproduction using spores produced in sporangia, but it is actually more closely related to brown algae.

Tomatoes infected with late blight.  Photo: Edward Sikora, Auburn University, Bugwood.org

Origin

Late blight is thought to have originated from central Mexico before appearing in the United States and Europe in the 1840s.  By the beginning of the twentieth century, the disease has been spread worldwide.

Habitat and Spread

Phytophythora infestans (late blight) grows and reproduces rapidly on host crops such as tomatoes and potatoes, but may be found on other plant species as well. In the United States, there have been occurrences on hairy nightshade (Solanum sarachiodes), bittersweet (Solanum dulcamara), and petunias (Petunia hybride).  Typically, environments with high moisture and moderate temperatures (60° and 80° F) are ideal for rapid reproduction.

Late bight can survive from season to season by living in infected potato tubers. Under favorable conditions, the pathogen may produce millions of spores that may spread in the air by wind or through the soil in wet conditions.  The disease may further be spread by infected seed potatoes, growths from previously diseases potatoes that were not harvested in the previous year, cull and compost piles, and also plant transplants from one field to another.

Impacts

It is very important to identity and control late blight. The disease is capable of wiping out entire crops even in commercial sized fields if the conditions are favorable. Not only will potato and tomato yields decrease in a given year, but infected tubers could reside in the soil to infect future crops if not managed properly. Late blight can have a large economic impact on a community through loss of tomato and potato yields, increased unemployment, as well as through the cost of control. A study by Guenthner et al. (2001) estimated the late blight cost to US growers to be over $287 million or $507 per hectare taking into account yield decrease, storage loss, decline in quality, price adjustment, and fungicide use. Additionally, fungicide application requires the use of machinery, which increases the amount of fuel needed. From an environmental standpoint, this may lead to decreases in energy supplies and increased pollution of the air and water (Haverkort et al. 2008).

Identification on Potatoes

Purple-brown lesions may occur on the surface of a tuber. If cut, the tuber will have rotted tissue that extends approximately one inch into the tuber and will appear reddish-brown. Observing symptoms may become difficult if the tuber, which was previously infected by late blight, becomes invaded from a second source, such as bacteria.

Dark lesions on an infected potato tuber.  Photo: R.W. Samson, Purdue University, Bugwood.org

After wet periods, black, water-soaked lesions on leaves may be noticed within a week after becoming infected.  Whitish growths (spores and sporangia) may be seen in humid conditions at the edges of the lesion, but once the lesion dries and turns brown, the spores will not be visible.

Lesions on infected potato leaf.  Photo: R.W. Samson, Purdue University, Bugwood.org

Stems of infected potato plants may have brown, greasy lesions. Stem lesions are frequently found at the junctions between the steam and a leaf, or at the top of a stem near clusters of leaves.

Identification on Tomatoes

Lesions that occur on the stem and leaves of tomato plants will look similar to lesions found on potato plants.  The fruit of tomatoes however, will have greasy circular lesion that may eventually become leathery and dark brown that take over the entire fruit. Spore producing structures may be present under humid conditions.

Tomato plant with fruit infected with late blight – Yuan-Min Shen, Taichung District Agricultural Research and Extension Station, Bugwood.org

Tomato stem with brown lesion spots – Yuan-Min Shen, Taichung District Agricultural Research and Extension Station, Bugwood.org

Whitish sporangia of Phytophthora infestans on the underside of a tomato leaf – Margaret McGrath, Cornell University, Bugwood.org

Top side of infected tomato leaf with brown leaf spot with a light green border – Margaret McGrath, Cornell University, Bugwood.org

If you are unsure if the plant is infected by late blight, placing suspected infected leaves in a moist chamber overnight may produce the whitish sporangia.

There are some plant pathogens that look like late blight. If you are unsure if what you are dealing with is late blight contact your local Cornell Cooperative Extension or submit the plant to a diagnostic clinic for identification. Some common late blight look-a-likes include:

Gray Mold: Late blight occurs in living tissue whereas gray mold will first establish itself in dead plant tissue.  Growth will be fuzzier and gray or brownish (not white). Affected fruit will soften, but not brown.
Drought stress: Occurs when part of the leaf tissue browns at leaf edges when dying from lack of water. No fuzzy pathogen growth.
Early blight: Spots on all parts of the plant are smaller than late blight, which has concentric ring patterns in them.
Septoria leaf spot: Smaller leaf and stem spots than late blight with a tan center. Fruits are not affected.
Buckeye fruit rot: Leaves and stems are not affected. Affects fruit (usually those close to soil) by turning them brown with white spores forming. Fruit stays firm and smooth.

Prevention and Control

It is best to try and avoid sources of spores early in the season. Only plant healthy certified seed potatoes as well as avoid any transplants or imported fruit that could have come in contact with the disease. Before planting, make sure to examine the seed and only plant those that are healthy and blemish free. Unhealthy, potentially infected seed and plants should be destroyed or made sure to be completely decomposed. If you had previously infected plants last season, make sure to remove all new growth. To prevent spores in the soil from infecting the potato tubers, you can hill up the soil around the plant base. Also, vines should be dead or cut above the soil surface 2-3 weeks before harvesting.

There are some potato and tomato varieties that are showing some resistance to late blight (Chen et al. 2003).  Planting these may be an alternative to slow down the spread of late blight, but may not necessarily prevent the disease from occurring. To decrease the impact of late blight on communities, researchers are further investigating genetic modification of potatoes to decrease susceptibility to late blight (Haverkort et al. 2008).

If it is known that late blight is in your area and the growing season is wet, there are fungicides that may help protect your plants. These need to be applied before coming in contact with the disease. Late blight can infect plants at any time during the growing season, so continual application of the fungicide may be needed.  Fungicides with maneb, mancozeb, chlorothalonil, or fixed copper and has tomato and potato late blight on the label could be used. There are concerns that overuse of fungicides may lead to the evolution of pesticide resistance within late blight. It is best to contact your local Cornell Cooperative Extension for more information about how to use pesticides and which ones are approved organic before using them. As always, it is important to read the instructions on the label and use the pesticides accordingly.

It is recommended to inspect plants every week for symptoms. If you experience an outbreak or know of local occurrences, it is also best to inform and educate neighboring growers.

Occurrences

As part of prevention of late blight, it is important to stay up-to-date on where late blight has already occurred by checking out www.usablight.org/map

Mute Swan

Origin  |  Habitat  |  Introduction and Spread  |  Impacts  |  Identification  |  Prevention and Control  |  Occurrences  |  New York Distribution Map

Background

Mute swans (Cygnus olor) are non-migratory waterfowl. They were first introduced in the United States in the 1870s as a decorative, captive waterfowl because of their impressive appearance. In the early 1900s, some swans escaped captivity in New Jersey (1916) and in New York (1919). Mute swans are now found throughout the Atlantic Flyway. These birds are very aggressive and threaten many native waterfowl species.

Adult mute swan.  Photo: Jim Occi, BugPics, Bugwood.org

Origin

Mute swans are native to Europe and parts of Asia.

Habitat

Mute swans thrive in aquatic habitats including bays, rivers, wetlands, lake inlets, and ponds where there is ample emergent and submerged vegetation. The swans utilize dense phragmites and cattail stands for nesting areas. A mated pair of mute swans typically stays in the same territory year-round, moving only for food shortages or if their habitat ices over.

Introduction and Spread

The swans were first brought to the United States and used in zoos and private estates because of their flashy appearance. A small number of birds escaped into the wild in New Jersey (1916) and New York (1919) and successfully created wild breeding populations. The birds then expanded into Rhode Island in the 1920s and are now found from southern Ontario, Canada to North Carolina. The release in the 1910s started with a wild population of about 500 birds. The population of mute swans in New York has increased in size to about 3000 birds.

The swans are capable of reproducing between the ages of two and five years old. They build large nests (4 – 5 feet in diameter) in March or April. Mute swans produce on average 6 eggs per clutch, but could produce as many as 11 per clutch. The eggs hatch in early June, approximately 35 days after being laid.

Impacts

Mute swans pose a threat to aquatic plant communities and other organisms that rely on the vegetation to survive. Swans can reach vegetation up to 4 feet deep. In the Chesapeake Bay, it is estimated that 4,000 swans could consume 12% of the aquatic vegetation each year (Avery and Tillman 2005). Aquatic plants found both above and below the water’s surface are affected by mute swans with the majority of damage occurring below the water’s surface (Stafford et al. 2012). Flocks of mute swans cause considerably more damage than those found in pairs (Tatu et al. 2007). Additionally, vertebrate and invertebrate species that rely on the vegetation cover are indirectly negatively impacted by mute swans. Ecosystems are under greater pressure from mute swans than from native migratory tundra swans (Cygnus columbianus) because the mute swans do not migrate and may be present year-round at the same location.

Some mute swans are very aggressive and territorial and will chase off and sometimes kill other waterfowl species that enter their territory. With the swan’s large breeding territories in wetlands, they displace many native birds for breeding habitat. Swans tend to be most aggressive during the nesting and brood-rearing stages.

Mute swans feeding on aquatic vegetation.  Photo: Jim Occi, BugPics, Bugwood.org

Identification

An adult mute swan is all white with an orange bill and black face with a black, fleshy knob on the forehead just above the nares. It is a large waterfowl that has a long, curved neck. Juvenile mute swans have dirty gray to white bodies, gray to pink legs, and a tan to pinkish bill. Adult mute swans weigh on average 25 lbs. The adults of native trumpeter and tundra swans have a similar body shape as mute swans, but may vary in overall size, facial markings and bill color. For more information about mute swans visit:

https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Mute_Swan/overview
http://www.trumpeterswansociety.org/docs/TTSS%20Swan%20Goose%20IDcolor.pdf

Adult mute swans have an orange bill and black facial markings.  Photo: Jim Occi, BugPics, Bugwood.org

Prevention and Control

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) conducts surveys and research to gain more information on nest distributions, clutch sizes, hatching and survival rates, and numbers of breeding birds in a population. Understanding more about the population dynamics and behavior of mute swans will help for developing efficient management strategies. If a collared mute swan is found in New York, report it to the DEC to help with their tracking efforts. (For more information visit: http://www.dec.ny.gov/animals/7076.html)

In many states, egg addling, culling, and euthanasia have been performed to control mute swan populations.  However, mute swans are protected by the New York State Environmental Conservation Law.  Do not handle or harm the swans, their nests, or any eggs without DEC authorization. If you have a problem with controlling mute swans, contact the DEC for more information.

Occurrences

Mute swans are currently found from Ontario, Canada to North Carolina, throughout the Atlantic Flyway region.  In New York State, Long Island and the Hudson Valley have the highest population of mute swans. Areas around Lake Ontario have been increasing in population size as well.

New York Distribution Map

This map shows confirmed observations (green points) submitted to the NYS Invasive Species Database. Absence of data does not necessarily mean absence of the species at that site, but that it has not been reported there. For more information, please visit iMapInvasives.

Northern Snakehead

Origin  |  Habitat  |  Introduction and Spread  |  Impacts  |  Identification  |  Prevention and Control  |  Occurrences  |  New York Distribution Map

Background

The northern snakehead fish (Channa argus) has been identified as an invasive aquatic fish across the United States.  Snakehead fish got their name because of their long, cylindrical body plan and large scales on their head that give them a snake-like appearance.  In the United States, there are four species of snakeheads: Channa argus (northern snakehead), Channa micropeltes (giant snakehead), Channa marulius (bullseye snakehead), and Channa maculate (blotched snakehead).  The northern snakehead fish has succeeded in establishing breeding populations in the wild.  This species is of concern because it is a top predator and disrupts the natural aquatic feeding structure in ecosystems.

Northern snakehead fish. Photo: U.S. Geological Survey Archive, U.S. Geological Survey, Bugwood.org

Origin

The snakehead fish family is native to parts of Asia and Africa.  The northern snakehead fish species is native to China and possibly Korea and Russia.

Habitat

Snakeheads are an aquatic fish that live in freshwater streams, rivers, wetlands, or ponds. They prefer low moving to stagnant waters.  Snakeheads can survive the cold winters and low oxygen environment.  Some snakeheads are capable of breathing atmospheric oxygen and may be able to jump out of the water to be found on terrestrial land near aquatic systems.  During the spawning season, northern snakehead fish prefer shallow waters with macrophyte cover (Lapointe et al. 2010). Nests are made by first clearing an area and then weaving aquatic vegetation into a column to hold and protect eggs.

Introduction and Spread

It is believed that the northern snakehead fish entered the United States when aquarium owners discarded their unwanted exotic captive species into local waterways.  The fish is also an important food source in other countries and could have been intentionally released into waterways to create a local food source for fisherman here in the United States.  Even though it is illegal in some states to possess a snakehead fish, they are utilized in some restaurants and are available for purchase online.  Northern snakehead fish can spread by swimming underwater and are also capable of breathing out of the water to move short distances on land.  Snakehead fish breeding occurs during the summer months (June to August).  However, there is not a full understanding of the details of the snakehead fish reproductive cycle yet as their nesting behaviors in their introduced habitat differ from those in their native range (Gascho Landis and Lapointe 2010).  Gascho Landis and Lapointe (2010) did find that parent fish will stay with their young up to 4 weeks to increase juvenile survival.

Impacts

Northern snakehead fish are strong predators at the juvenile and adult stages of their life cycle.  Many native species are outcompeted for food resources.  Small prey, such as zooplankton, larvae, and small fish and crustaceans populations may be threatened by feeding juvenile snakehead fish.  Adults devour fish, crustaceans, small amphibians, reptiles, and some birds and mammals.  During the spawning season and after the young are born, snakehead fish may become very aggressive towards trespassing species.  If the northern snakehead fish becomes established in the United States, it could cost millions of dollars in management, and ecological and recreational damages.

The mouth of a northern snakehead fish is filled with many sharp teeth.  Photo: U.S. Geological Survey Archive, U.S. Geological Survey, Bugwood.org

Identification

Northern snakehead fish have long, narrow bodies with long dorsal and anal fins.  They have a large mouth and protruding jaw with canine-like teeth.  The fish get their name from the enlarged scales, shape and irregular, blotchy coloration on their head that give a snake-like appearance.  Snakehead fish may vary size depending on their age and location, but grow to be up to 4 feet in length.  Invasive northern snakehead fish are easily confused with the native bowfin and burbot. Check out a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service factsheet for a comparison of the northern snakehead fish to the burbot and bowfin here: http://www.fws.gov/midwest/fisheries/library/fact-snakehead.pdf

Northern snakehead fish.  Illustration: Susan Trammell, Bugwood.org
Immature northern snakehead fish in the center with two adults. Photo: Brett Billings, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Bugwood.org

Prevention and Control

All snakehead fish have been assigned injurious wildlife status.  Under the Federal Lacey Act, these fish and viable eggs cannot be moved through importation or interstate transport. Once populations are found, efforts are made to eradicate and control snakehead fish.

Waters with snakehead fish presence can be treated using chemicals.  Previous control efforts have found that Rotenone has been successful in lakes and ponds.  However, chemical control methods should be done by professionals since the chemicals may effect or kill non-target fish species and also may require permits for use.  If approved to work with chemicals, always follow the instructions on the label.

If you catch a snakehead fish, do not release it back into the water. Kill it, freeze it in a double bag and then report the fish and its location to a local natural resource agency for documentation.  To prevent more occurrences from happening, it is important to control the current populations and also to educate others on the importance of not releasing or transporting exotic species to new ecosystems.

Occurrences

The northern snakehead fish was first discovered in the United States in California in 1997.  This species is considered established in Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New York and Arkansas.  Individual fish have also been collected in California, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, Delaware and North Carolina.  Established breeding populations in the Potomac River in Maryland and Virgina were discovered in 2004.  Genetic evidence shows that the introduction in the Potomac was unrelated to previous infestations in Maryland (Starnes et al. 2011).  In New York, the first documentation was reported in 2005 at Meadow Lake in Queens and then again in 2008 in a stream in Wawayanda, New York.  For the USGS interactive distribution point map visit:

https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/factsheet.aspx?speciesid=2265

New York Distribution Map

This map shows confirmed observations (green points) submitted to the NYS Invasive Species Database. Absence of data does not necessarily mean absence of the species at that site, but that it has not been reported there. For more information, please visit iMapInvasives.

Norway Maple

Background | Origin | Habitat | Introduction and Spread | Impacts | Identification | Prevention and Control | Occurrences | New York Distribution Map

Background

Norway maple (Acer platanoides) is a large deciduous tree that can grow up to approximately 40-60 feet in height.  They are tolerant of many different growing environments and have been a popular tree to plant on lawns and along streets because of their hardiness.  Norway maples have very shallow roots and produce a great deal of shade which makes it difficult for grass and other plants to grow in the understory below.  Additionally, they are prolific seed producers and are now invading forests and forest edges.

Norway maple infestation. Photo: Leslie J. Mehrhoff, University of Connecticut, Bugwood.org
Adult Norway maple tree. Photo: Leslie J. Mehrhoff, University of Connecticut, Bugwood.org

Origin

Norway maples are native to Europe and Western Asia.

Habitat

Norway maples are found growing all over the United States in many diverse environments. They are very well adapted to extreme soil types and found in hardy to USDA Zone 4. Norway Maples tolerate a wide range of temperatures. They do prefer full sun, but may also be seen in shady habitats. Also, this species is tolerant to sulfur dioxide pollution and ozone, so they can thrive in urban settings or forests. Norway Maples will be found in the United States anywhere from the border of Canada south to the Carolinas in early or late succession forests, wetlands, yards or gardens, or in disturbed open areas and roadsides.

Introduction and Spread

Many Norway maples made their way from Europe to the United States by being transplanted as ornamental specimens or by having individual seeds escape cultivation. These trees produce ample amounts of winged seed which are dispersed readily in the wind and germinate quickly. A suggested reason for the success of many invasive species is the absence of predators in the invaded habitat. A study by Cincotta et al. (2009) found that foliar insect and fungal damage was significantly higher on native sugar maples than on the invasive Norway maples. This could be one of the contributing factors to the Norway maple’s success.

Impacts

Forests that are intact are generally more likely to ward off invaders. However, Norway maple has been found to be very successful at establishing itself in a variety of conditions including mature, deeply shaded forests (Martin and Marks 2006). Due to the dense canopy of Norway maples, forest diversity is starting to decline because the excess shade they create inhibits the regeneration of sugar maples and other native seedlings. The shallow root system makes growing difficult for other native shrubs and wildflowers in the understory. In urban environments, the root systems also destroy pavement, requiring expensive repairs. Other species of flora and fauna, such as insects and birds, may indirectly be affected due to the change in resource diversity and availability. Norway maple is also susceptible to certain types of fungi, such as Verticillium wilt and anthracnose and may also serve as a host for aphids.

Identification

Norway maples have simple, green, and opposite leaves. Leaves of Norway maples usually are broader than they are high, about four to seven inches wide, with five prominent lobes. The bark of a Norway maple is grayish black and furrowed. This species tends to leaf out earlier in the spring than other maples and forms a broad-rounded crown. Yellow or greenish-yellow flowers are approximately 8 mm in diameter and are found in clusters that are present from April to May. During the summer, fruits mature into helicopter-like blades with wide-spreading wings. In the fall, leaves usually turn a pale yellow. One of the easiest ways to differentiate Norway maple from sugar maple is to cut the petiole (or leaf stalk) or vein and if a milky substances oozes out, it is a Norway maple.  Also, bud tips of Norway maples are more blunt, whereas sugar maples are pointy and sharp.

The prominent five-lobed leaf of the Norway maple. Photo: John M. Randall, The Nature Conservancy, Bugwood.org
The wide-spreading wings of the Norway maple fruit. Photo: Paul Wray, Iowa State University, Bugwood.org
Flower clusters of Norway maple. Photo: Robert Vidéki, Doronicum Kft., Bugwood.org
Broad and blunt bud of a Norway Maple. Photo: Rob Routledge, Sault College, Bugwood.org

Prevention and Control

It is recommended to plant alternative tree species that are native to this region to prevent further spread of Norway maple. Other maple species that are native to the Northeastern United States include red maple (Acer rubrum), sugar maple (Acer saccharum), and silver maple (Acer saccharinum).

Seedlings of Norway maple can be pulled from moist soil before they get too large. Other types of manual removal include digging out saplings and root systems or cutting down large trees. Girdling the trees by removing the bark layer (including the cambium) can also be performed, but is most effective in the spring. Leftover stumps can be ground out or new growth that develops from old stumps can be cut in future years. Some chemical herbicides, such as glyphosate or triclopyr may be useful for control, but contact your local extension office for more information on chemical application and always follow state requirements and the instructions on the label.

Occurrences

Norway maple is found on both the western and eastern sides of the United States. It ranges from Canada in the north and down south to the Carolinas.

Distribution of Norway Maple in the United States.  States shaded green have Norway maple present. In each of the shaded states, Norway maple is considered invasive.  Map: Plants.usda.gov

New York Distribution Map

This map shows confirmed observations (green points) submitted to the NYS Invasive Species Database. Absence of data does not necessarily mean absence of the species at that site, but that it has not been reported there. For more information, please visit iMapInvasives.

Plum Pox Virus

Origin | Introduction and Spread | Impacts | Identification and Symptoms | Prevention | Control | Occurrences

Background

The plum pox virus (PPV) or Potyvirus sp. is a viral disease that affects stone fruits, especially those in the Prunus genus, such as plums, peaches, nectarines, apricots, almonds, and cherries. Sharka disease is another common name for PPV. There are six strains of PPV, of which, the D strain or Dideron strain has been identified in New York State. The D strain primarily infects peaches, nectarines, apricots, and plums.

Origin

Plum pox virus (PPV) was first reported in 1910 in Bulgaria.

Introduction and Spread

Plum pox virus has spread to many countries worldwide. The virus may be spread long distance by the transplant of infected plant propagations, nursery stock, or illegal traffic. Insufficient monitoring of stone fruit before transporting the fruit from one location to another is also a cause for spread. Some fruit may appear symptomless initially and may accidentally pass inspection. Plum pox virus spreads over a short distance using aphid vectors when sucking the sap of an infected plant and transferring it to a healthy plant. The D strain of PPV is not known to be seed-transmitted.

Impacts

It is estimated that the plum pox virus will have a $600 million per year economic impact on the plum, peach, and apricot industry worldwide (Fuchs et. al. 2008). A study from 2006 estimates the economic loss in previous years to the peach industry from the PPV D-strain in the United States and Canada to be about 4.8 million euros (about $6.1 million USD) from the removal of 264,000 trees in Canada and 190,000 trees in Pennsylvania (Cambra et al. 2006). Widespread outbreaks of the virus could lead to increase cost for consumers due to a decline in production and exportation.

Identification and Symptoms

Symptoms of plum pox virus may vary depending the virus strain, cultivar and various environmental factors. Symptoms may not be seen until three or more years after infection. Vein yellowing or light green to yellow rings or blotches may form on the plant leaves. Some leaves, such as those of peaches, may exhibit crinkling, curling, or puckering. Leaf symptoms are typically seen more at cooler temperatures in the spring and fall seasons.

Symptoms of plum pox virus on plum leaves. Photo: Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft Archive, Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Bugwood.org

Some larger flowers may exhibit color breaking, such as those on peach trees. The fruit of infected plants may have pigmented rings or patterns (seen in peaches), or look misshapen or deformed and turn brown (Apricots) or get rings or spots as well as discolored reddish flesh (Plums). In most cases, fruit yield and quality will decrease significantly.

Pigmented rings on an infected peach.  Photo: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization Archive, Bugwood.org
Plum pox virus on apricot seed –John Hammond, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Bugwood.org
Plum pox virus on apricot fruit – Ministry of Agriculture and Regional Development Archive, Ministry of Agriculture and Regional Development, Bugwood.org (right)
Deformed fruit of infected plum tree. Photo: Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft Archive, Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Bugwood.org

Prevention

Careful regulation and control of plant material is important so that only pathogen-free material is used commercially. If you are a grower or a nursery make sure you are buying certified plant materials that have been virus tested. Also, extensive surveys, removal, and destruction of infected trees may help to prevent the disease from spreading further.

The PPV Lab at the New York State Agricultural Experiment Station in Geneva, NY works with the New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets and USDA-APHIS to screen Prunus trees for the plum pox virus in New York State.

For more information visit: http://web.pppmb.cals.cornell.edu/fuchs/ppv/ppv_detection.html
Watch a video about the process: http://web.pppmb.cals.cornell.edu/fuchs/ppv/detectionvideo.html

Control

Early detection of plum pox virus is important because there is no cure once it gets established in an orchard.  Once infected, trees with the virus, and those in a 50-meter radius, need to be removed and destroyed to eradicate PPV. This is important because PPV does not kill trees. If the trees are left to stand, the tree will remain as a reservoir for the virus (Cambra et al. 2006). Chemical control of aphids using insecticides has been found to be ineffective at stopping the spread of PPV. Currently, one of the prospects being looked into as a control and prevention method is developing plant resistance to PPV through the use of genetic engineering. If you have questions about the virus or control methods, contact your local extension office.

Occurrences

PPV spread across most of Europe by the 1970s. In the late 1990s, PPV had spread to many other countries in the eastern hemisphere and then was first detected in Chile in 1992. The first documentation of the disease in the United States was in Pennsylvania in 1999. By 2006, there were reports of the disease in New York and Michigan.  The D strain was originally isolated in France.